Search for: "Pena v State"
Results 241 - 260
of 374
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2012, 6:51 am
State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 7:05 pm
Pena-Irala. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 12:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:18 pm
Casenotes: state. [read post]
3 May 2012, 1:12 pm
The defendants taken into custody today are expected to make their initial appearances before United States Magistrate Judge William V. [read post]
3 May 2012, 1:12 pm
The defendants taken into custody today are expected to make their initial appearances before United States Magistrate Judge William V. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:01 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:14 am
In a similar case from 2010, State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 9:15 pm
State Attorney Katherine Fernandez Rundle just got some uncomforting news. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 7:09 am
And in Sosa v. [read post]
Corporate Liability under the Alien Tort Statute of 1789 - Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Shell Petroleum Co.
26 Feb 2012, 2:28 pm
Sosa v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 9:09 pm
., v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 5:07 am
State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 4:04 pm
The state of libel litigation in England and Wales in 2011 can be summarised like this: no jury trials, not much media involvement and similar numbers of cases to 2010. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 2:33 pm
Gore (de 1996) y luego en State Farm v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Vance, et al. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 7:47 pm
Pena, the Court of Appeals stated, "Decisional law tells us that, though the statutory ground upon which the first degree robbery count was brought is not explicit in that regard (Penal Law, s 160.15, subd. 3), the jury was required to find that Turrell actually possessed a dangerous instrument at the time of the crime (see People v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Beginning with Filartiga v Pena-Irala[2] and continuing through to Doe v Unocal[3] and more recent cases, there has been a general consensus amongst the various circuits of the US courts that both individual and corporate defendants could be held accountable under the ATS for egregious human rights abuses. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Panam Management Group, Inc. v. [read post]
