Search for: "People v Fields"
Results 241 - 260
of 5,412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2016, 10:21 am
In my own view, the matter is unusual as both parties, in certain aspects, are carrying the same ideology: to try and gain a level playing field for all. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 5:45 am
Four years ago people advocating the abolition of software patents made a lot of noise, including a movie named Patent Absurdity, about a case pending then before the Supreme Court of the United States: Bilski v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
Courts have recognized that under Penal Law § 35.10(1) a parent may use physical force against a child when he reasonably believes it to be necessary to promote discipline or the child's welfare (see Fields, 134 AD2dat 365; see People v Prue, 219 AD2d 873 [4th Dept 1995]; People v Thompson, 9 Misc 3d 1123[A] [City Ct, Westchester County 2005]). [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 1:52 pm
The seminal case, Greenman v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Sorrell v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 10:43 am
By Eric Goldman Parker v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 10:22 am
The field of non-repudiation services is getting more and more crowded every week. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 1:18 pm
Lang v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 5:42 am
The Bill is in response to the 2018 ruling of the Supreme Court of Texas in ConocoPhillips Company et al v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 10:28 am
One check on the peremptory is that, since Batson v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 5:23 pm
In Broussard v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided Ziglar v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided Ziglar v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 12:45 pm
The case is entitled Perkins et al., v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 4:27 am
People v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:58 am
It’s a hugely growing field. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 3:32 pm
To conclude that officers in the field must follow a plan which is set in place by the higher echelons, and then to conclude that the officers in the field may cavalierly disregard certain key elements of that plan, whether intentionally or unintentionally, would be to countenance the "standardless and unconstrained discretion" and "evil" the Supreme Court spoke about in the case of Delaware v Prouse,, 440 US 648, 661 [1979]. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 11:16 am
In Johnson, et al., v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:32 pm
Flores and Gentile v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
Hurles opens the field for the next Relist King. [read post]