Search for: "People v Garcia"
Results 241 - 260
of 541
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2015, 9:06 am
Garcia v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 12:02 pm
Q: Garcia v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am
The islands’ indigenous population, known as Chaogossians, was a very small community of fewer than 1,000 people who lived in extremely simple lifestyle. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [week ending on Sunday 7 June] - Swiss claims | Italian-sounding trade marks for cosmetics | “IP… [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:25 pm
And as I predicted elsewhere, Judge Kozinski then came to the Garcia v Google case. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
.* Lego 3D manikin mark valid, says General CourtJeremy reports on Case T‑395/14 Best-Lock (Europe) Ltd v OHIM, Lego Juris A/S, a General Court of the European Union decision regarding the validity of a Lego Community trade mark that will be familiar to many readers who are children, have children or are movie buffs: the three-dimensional shape of a little Lego man.* Swiss cheese, Innocence and a question of guilt: Garcia v Google explainedValentina… [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 4:30 am
Court of Appeal in 'Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 10:29 pm
In short, there were two different legs of the call with different information as “contents” and different people as “parties” to the communication. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Team Members: Michael Chiaramonte (2L), Vittoria Fiorenza (2L), Hanna Shoshany (3L), Victoria Wagnerman (2L) The competition involved a criminal case of People v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
In Mills, the plaintiff claimed that, due to a variant gene (“CYP”), she could not metabolize the defendant’s drug as well as most other people. [read post]
26 May 2015, 4:30 am
This reasoning is echoed in the recent Garcia v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 1:28 am
Von Braun’s crown jewel was his developing the Saturn V rocket that carried men to the moon. [read post]
19 May 2015, 3:48 pm
Garcia. [read post]
3 May 2015, 9:23 am
. * Among the many analytical deficiencies of the now-vacated Garcia v. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 9:48 am
Panel V. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm
Not every gunshot ineluctably results in serious physical injury (see, People v Gray, 30 AD3d 771 [3rd Dept 2006] [victim shot with shotgun from 20 feet away, evidence insufficient to establish serious physical injury]; see also, People v Rojas, 61 NY2d 726 [1984] [gunshot injury does not by itself establish substantial pain as required for physical injury]; People v Francis, 112 AD2d 167 [2nd Dept 1985] [same]; People v… [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:23 am
Caulkett and Bank of America v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 9:33 am
A current case that foreshadows this is the decision in Garcia v. [read post]
