Search for: "People v High" Results 241 - 260 of 15,043
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2014, 8:41 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Deere, I took the decision to task in an article,”Retreat from the High Water Mark: Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims Involving Excessive Fees after Tibble v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 10:24 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
NY's high court, in a 5-2 decision (People v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 6:10 pm by Marcia Oddi
Here is the April 7, 2011 opinion of the Illinois Supreme Court in the cases of People v. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 10:22 am by Brandon Gatto
The goal of the endeavor is to counteract the 2010 US Supreme Court [official website] decision of Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 6:28 am
From the report, "with the exception of nuclear DNA analysis ... no forensic method has been rigorously shown able to consistently, and with a high degree of certainty, demonstrate a connection between evidence and a specific individual or source. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:34 am
.'s two daughters attended Fairfield High School (FHS). [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 10:03 pm
Moreover, at least in a high-performance Zivco Edge 540, she may well be a better pilot than the people who watched her take off from the Butler County Airport in 2006. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 4:19 pm
  (This amount seems super high to me, but perhaps the officers who went and picked up the offender ate and drove/flew quite well.)But the Court of Appeal reverses. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 8:17 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The New Jersey court unanimously stepped up to say what Justice Sonia Sotomayor suggested in a lone concurrence in US v. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 2:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
That traditional approach was liberalized by the New York Court of Appeals in the cases of People v Stone (1974) and People v Sugden (1974). [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm by Heather Donkers
The exposure of intimate body parts in the privacy of a bedroom was found to attract a high expectation of privacy and a critical distinction between mere observation and the making of a permanent recording, the latter of which has the capacity to be redistributed amongst people not intended to view the image. [read post]