Search for: "People v I. S."
Results 241 - 260
of 39,155
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2008, 1:52 pm
I mean, if he's a 25- or 35-year old guy, this whole stuff seems so weird. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:56 pm
With the following introduction: "Fifteen years ago we said: 'Ralph Helmut Nitschmann has lead a life of crime.' (People v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 7:22 pm
It flows, it's breezy, and it's persuasive. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 8:48 am
There were people as far as the eye could see to witness the inauguration of this country’s first Black president. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 2:31 pm
As, I suspect, could many of us.On the merits, I recommend reading Justice Stratton's partial dissent. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 10:18 am
Because, I'm sure, it's utterly and totally true. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 2:47 pm
People don't do anything without reasons. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:11 pm
" That's self-defense, even though it's based upon a mistake of fact.You can see why we don't punish people for that. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 12:52 pm
In three prior appeals, of which we took judicial notice, the same prosecutor was criticized for improper conduct, including the observation in People v. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 1:09 pm
I wonder who's right. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:28 pm
I THERE WAS INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO ESTABLISH APPELLANT'S GUILT3. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 11:52 am
I note what must be new discussions of Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 3:59 pm
The Court of Appeal reverses the conviction -- though barely, I think -- and remands for a new trial, holding that what transpired here was prejudicial.As I said, there's much in here with which I profoundly agree. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 5:29 pm
But I am sufficiently marginally connected with reality that I know the face when I see it. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 8:15 pm
My strong recommendation is nonetheless that you should not let people buy Ecstacy from you through the admittedly expedient means of sending you a text message.Here's one reason why. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 10:32 am
Here's some background: [I]f the Court adopts the petitioners’ interpretation of this statutory provision, millions of people would be cut off from the financial assistance that largely underpins the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 11:20 pm
It's an important issue, and one that I imagine arises with some frequency; indeed, introducing testimony like this may well arise from an outline that a wide variety of prosecutors use when examining witnesses who have made a deal.If Part I is right, I'd publish it. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 6:23 pm
Better than the story I could have come up with under similar circumstances; that's for sure. [read post]
9 May 2016, 2:07 pm
I'm not saying that because I believe Justice Kriegler's decision to be necessarily wrong and/or pernicious. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 10:28 am
This morning's opinion reminds us that methamphetamine users are not necessarily the brightest people in the universe. [read post]
