Search for: "People v Levels (Robert)" Results 241 - 260 of 1,659
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2022, 10:43 pm by Josh Blackman
The editorial sketches out, at a very high level, what is going on behind the scenes. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 4:22 am by Emma Snell
Subjugating the will of a free people. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
To see why, it helps to begin with what has been the most important administrative law case for nearly four decades.In Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
It could be retained today on stare decisis grounds, but instead, the Rehnquist and Roberts Courts--with the enthusiastic backing of the most originalist justices--have extended it. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
In a case on the plenary docket, Ramirez v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am by INFORRM
The UK GDPR has previously been successful in suing people who may have undesirable/compromising information about an someone on their device. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 8:31 am by Quinta Jurecic, Andrew Kent
A few examples: Trump repurposed money to build the Mexican border wall even after Congress had denied funding for that project; he publicly dangled presidential pardons or commutations and later delivered them—to Roger Stone, Paul Manafort and Michael Flynn—in an attempt to deter their cooperation with Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation; he hounded the Senate-confirmed attorney general out of office and replaced him with a manifestly unqualified subordinate on… [read post]
McAleenan, Jackson temporarily blocked the Trump administration’s plan to expand fast-track deportations of people in the country illegally. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
Nevertheless, Democrats surrounded Barrett with photos of the type of people who could die without the ACA, or with Barrett’s confirmation. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 7:24 am by Howard M. Wasserman
Abbassi against high-level executive officials enacting post-9/11 national-security policy and in Hernandez v. [read post]