Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,803
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2021, 4:44 am
The Secretary of State maintained that the Supreme Court decisions in R (Unison) v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 4:48 pm
and at [36]: The reality is that what the vast majority of people learn about judgments comes (understandably) from whatever news source they choose to use. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 9:57 am
In the Supreme Court's recent standing decision, Uzuegbunam v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 11:14 am
In HKSAR v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:31 am
Lord Sales and Lord Burrows gave the sole judgment, with which the other members of the Court agreed. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:30 am
Lord Hamblen gave the lead judgment, with which Lord Hodge, Lady Black and Lord Briggs agreed. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 2:35 pm
" The President, Fessenden contended, has the right to communicate with the People. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 11:05 am
I ultimately did not answer this question, but said the question was open under Walter Nixon v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 1:01 pm
The people doing the impeaching may not only be wrong, but they also might be the wrongdoers. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 2:25 am
In March 2017 a controversial flight was due to leave Stansted to deport a group of people to destinations in West Africa. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 1:32 am
Unlike the primary focus of this Blog, it deals not with the appeals the court hears, but with the behaviour of the people at the heart of decision-making in the Court: the UKSC Justices. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 12:45 am
The proposed class is vast, comprising an estimated 46.2 million people. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 6:02 am
From Bauer v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
Lord Acton (1834-1902), the English historian, famously said that “power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 4:27 pm
As to the wisdom of the Defence, in both its common law and statutory incarnations; this is what Lord Hobhouse said in his speech in Reynolds v Times Newspapers [2001] 2 AC 127 to the then House of Lords; “The liberty to communicate (and receive) information has a similar place in a free society but it is important always to remember that it is the communication of information not misinformation which is the subject of this liberty. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 1:27 pm
As stated above, the accommodation was a studio flat, that was occupied for 4 people, 2 of whom were adults. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 1:11 pm
This is according to the test laid down by the Supreme Court in 2017 in Ivey v Genting Casinos. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 4:30 pm
UgandaHuman Rights Network Uganda v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:11 pm
The decision arose on an application to stay or dismiss the enforcement proceeding at the jurisdictional stage. [2] Altimo Holdings and Investment Ltd v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd [2011] UKPC 7, [2012] 1 WLR 1804. [3] The judge noted that the House of Lords had rejected the argument that it should not recognize the courts of the German Democratic Republic (Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd (No 2) [1967] 1 AC 853), and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals was not… [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm
Miller (Wikipedia) U.S. v. [read post]
