Search for: "People v Person"
Results 241 - 260
of 31,524
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2020, 1:09 pm
" (That's a gang challenge, essentially asking the person if they're with a rival gang.)Step Three: The person, who's not a gang member, accurately responds: "I'm not from nowhere. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 12:29 pm
He was also right: there was indeed a case in 1909 about whether a pistol in a saddlebag counted as being carried "about his person" under the statute. [read post]
1 May 2018, 2:25 pm
The Court of Appeal sometimes provides neutral insight into the lives of people with whom you are not typically personally familiar. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:38 pm
In Felker v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 2:42 pm
Or at least you can't do that just by getting together a group of people (or one person) and telling them: "Decide yes or no who's telling the truth. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 12:57 pm
In People v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 1:28 pm
We know that when you have sex with a clearly intoxicated and incapacitated person, you can be found guilty of rape, because they can't actually consent. [read post]
10 Dec 2024, 10:40 am
(a)). 1 Under section 23552, subdivision (a), if a person convicted under section 23550 receives probation, “the court shall impose as [a] condition[] of probation that the person be confined in a county jail for at least 180 days. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 10:30 am
For the past 30 years, this status has been part of the equation and most likely affected an innumerable number of would-be personal injury claims.A Brief History of the SituationThis entire situation goes back to 1986 when a California appellate court case known as Rodriguez v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 3:43 pm
Can't think of a more purely evil person." [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:09 pm
(D) Neither (A) nor (B).Personally, I think that (D) is the answer least likely to be true.Regardless, the defendant is sentenced to death, and the California Supreme Court unanimously affirms. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 2:04 pm
Four years, eight months in prison.From reading the facts, I'm not even 100% certain that they apprehended the right person. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:12 pm
Or that when the owner subsequently comes out to confront the thief, and his dog (a big German Shepherd) follows thereafter, it counts as a threat to shoot "a person" under the criminal threats statute when an accomplice says "Shoot the dog"? [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:38 am
I liked this footnote by Justice O'Rourke (in a case involving the extended committment of a mentally challenged individual):"The term 'mentally retarded person' is used in Welfare and Institutions Code section 6500, which is the statute providing the grounds for Hartshorn's commitment. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 11:54 am
Ordinarily you'd be happy if someone told you that you were pretty clearly sane.But the contrary is true when that person is a trial judge holding that the evidence of your sanity is so clear that she's taking this issue away from the jury. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 1:29 pm
"In response to another hypothetical, [Officer Krish testified that] a person in a gang would still be a gang member, even if he or she moved away from the area, got a bachelor's degree, went to law school and became a lawyer, and returned to the neighborhood to play basketball and drink beers with other gang members." [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:09 pm
PORTRAYING IDENTIFIABLE PERSONSA person's right to privacy has to be balanced against other people's rights under the First Amendment. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 2:01 pm
On the one hand, we've got a person who's lived essentially his entire life as a gangbanger. [read post]
12 May 2009, 8:37 pm
X appeals to the NY Court of Appeals, which ruled 4-3 today (People v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 5:51 pm
(People v. [read post]
