Search for: "People v Sanchez" Results 241 - 260 of 294
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2009, 11:48 am
Supporters note the momentum they gained March 4 when the Supreme Court, in Wyeth v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 10:51 am
First, that some people really, really want to be in the United States. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 3:07 am
Miguel Mojica Subscription Required KINGS COUNTYCriminal Practice Defendant Denied Vacatur of Plea For Alleged Misinformation on Collateral Consequences People v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 1:04 pm
In fact, in a pair of cases decided by our Court of Criminal Appeals fifteen years ago known as Sanchez v. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 12:38 pm
People v Delgado, 80 NY2d 780,783 (1992); People v Thompson, 91 AD2d 672 (2nd Dept. 1982), modified 60 NY2d 513 (1983); People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 (2nd Dept. 1982). [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 9:10 am
  I stopped to watch because CNN anchor Rick Sanchez was tweeting the press briefing on a split screen, showing not only some of his tweets but many from people he apparently follows, allowing me to follow the press conference, in a sense. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 8:04 pm
Or maybe also because I know that, as a white guy, it wouldn't happen to me.But while stopped at a red light at an intersection in Hayward in September of 2003, Francisco Sanchez -- who had just paid his union dues and wasn't afilliated with a gang in any way -- was murdered in cold blood for no reason other than an idiot Norteno gang member concluded that Sanchez was a member of a rival Sureno gang because he was wearing a blue UNC baseball cap.The thought that you can… [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, November 06, 2008 Santos-Sanchez v. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 5:43 pm
The exception applies not only at the physical boundaries of the United States, but also at the "the functional equivalent" of a border, Almeida-Sanchez v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Sanchez-Badillo, No. 051800, 052045, 052047 Convictions and sentences for conspiring to distribute heroin, cocaine, cocaine base, and marijuana are affirmed over claims of error that: 1) jury's conspiracy verdict was not supported by evidence; 2) trial court made sentencing errors; 3) evidence was insufficient to support jury's verdict against one of the defendants on weapons charges and prosecutorial misconduct entitles him to a new trial; and 4) trial judge made impermissible… [read post]