Search for: "People v Younger" Results 241 - 260 of 1,093
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2020, 12:01 pm by Joy Waltemath
However, the court did rule that the plaintiffs adequately justified their narrow request for jurisdictional discovery (Bradley v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Murder case on Tinder, which was v. helpful. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 8:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Traditionally, hackathons were informal/passionate programmers, usually younger, anti-establishment. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
By the end of World War II, over 40 percent of Americans smoked cigarettes, but today, millions of people are giving up cigarettes and only 13.7 percent of the population smokes regularly.[1] Some former smokers have substituted cigarettes with electronic cigarettes, oral smokeless tobacco, or other tobacco-free nicotine products. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 7:13 am by Paula Lombardi
The first, ENvironnement JEUnesse v Procureur General du Canada, was a Quebec case filed in 2018. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:00 am by Jack Sharman
Of the making of lists of books, there shall be no end. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 12:07 pm by Larry
[Note to younger readers: Old people like me sometimes use currency. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:07 pm by Kym Stapleton
        This morning the California Supreme Court issue its opinion in People v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 6:08 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
They are particularly hazardous for elderly people whose bones break more easily than younger people. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 12:32 pm by Ashoka Mukpo
The ACLU is currently suing to end the MPP, with the 9th Circuit having heard arguments in the case, Innovation Law Lab v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
We also discuss implications for informed decision-making by the Marshallese and local atoll governments and their people on issues pertaining to island resettlement. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 11:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The district court declined to exercise jurisdiction and dismissed the case under the doctrine of Younger v. [read post]