Search for: "People v. Booth" Results 241 - 260 of 278
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2022, 4:42 am by Emma Snell
It’s also unlikely officials would bring only obstruction charges amid several other Trump investigations into potential crimes, the people said. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Jan. 29, 2009)Remanding bench verdict against 56yo rejected applicant's age discrim claim; District Court failed to evaluate statement preferring "younger educated people" as possible direct evidence>11th Circuit>> Birdyshaw v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am by Marty Lederman
Not surprisingly, there are already a slew of reactions to the Court's landmark decision on Friday in Carpenter v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:02 am
Of particular interest to Episcopalians is the current case in Massachusetts of Gill v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
  Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:40 pm by Fred Goldsmith
We had a swell time at the show, met lots of great people, and look forward to next year's show! [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 7:04 am by Minick Law
I feel like sometimes when we go to the voting booth, we basically see our control as being able to kind of circle that one name versus the other on the ballot. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 6:31 am by Rui Dias
It was also discussed in the judgments C-507/17, Google v CNIL; and Case C-136/17 that a data subject should have a “right to be forgotten” where the retention of such data infringes the Directive 95/46 and the GDPR. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm by Thornhill Law Firm, APLC
’ Generally only idle people, pursuing ‘idle curiosity’ have time to visit court rooms in person. [read post]