Search for: "People v. Butts" Results 241 - 260 of 324
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2009, 1:25 am
" - Isn't is hypocritical how those who are in the legal profession put people in prison all the time, and never believe these stories, yet when it's their butts on the line, the same excuses come out? [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 10:52 am by Tara Hofbauer
” Jack explained how the Supreme Court’s decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 4:31 am by SHG
For any reader whose head has been firmly implanted up his butt for the past 50+ years, Dwyer then explains that there is a 1963 case called Brady v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
It is estimated that during the struggle to dominate the Butte, the French detonated 320 mines and the Germans 199, albeit to absolutely no avail whatsoever. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:15 pm by Michael Lowe
Undercover Operations:  John Stings or Reverse Stings Trying to arrest people involved in commercial sex transactions is not easy from a law enforcement perspective. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 3:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
He finds First Amendment invocations mystical; prefers the Mastercard v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 2:15 am by Dylan Gibbs
The majority’s section 25 framework sorts out situations where Indigenous interests butt up against Charter rights. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:35 am by SHG
"[H]aving deliberately availed himself of his right to remain silent, the defendant's failure to give a more complete exculpatory statement to the police 'may simply [have been] attributable to his awareness that he [was] under no obligation to speak' to the police, including to implicate his friend in a shooting, and to his knowledge that his decision not to speak would not be used against him at trial," the majority said in an unsigned opinion, citing the 1981 Court of… [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 8:28 am by Yishai Schwartz
Turning to detainee news: Wells reported the much awaited DC panel decision in the Guantanamo force-feeding case, Aamer v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:42 am by SHG
If you want to really shred precedent, why not start with Marbury v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
While Canadian judges, like their Commonwealth siblings, are unwilling to adopt a New York Times v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 2:33 am by SHG
The funny thing about irony is how often it bites one in the butt. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 5:17 pm by Ruth Carter
There’s no way a proper chest binder is getting over my hips and butt. [read post]