Search for: "People v. Fell" Results 241 - 260 of 2,537
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2009, 1:22 pm
Last Friday a divided Appellate Division, Fourth Department ruled that an extended investigation resulting from a tinted-windows stop was illegal, and suppressed drugs, dismissed drug possession, assault 2, resisting arrest and OGA convictions as a result (People v Edwards, 2009 WL 2635784 [4th Dept 8/28/09]). [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:24 pm by emagraken
  Reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, (Danicek v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 8:22 am by Bryan West
Inter alia, Witmar believed an overhanging crane would bring undue stress to its tenants after a July 2021 crane collapse in downtown Kelowna that led to the death of five people, one of whom was in an adjacent building when the crane fell. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 4:01 pm
” Husband told police the boy was playing outside and fell, causing the injuries to his arms and face. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 11:37 am
The bill was intended to undo last year's Supreme Court decision in Ledbetter v. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 1:58 am by INFORRM
The impugned statements fell squarely within the type of material identified in Myerson v Smith’s Weekly Publishing Co. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:01 am by R.J. MacReady
One of the witnesses lived in a two-bedroom apartment with seven other people including Perez. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 2:19 pm
In the end, a claim of ineffectiveness is ultimately concerned with the fairness of the process as a whole rather than its particular impact on the outcome of the DUI case as held in People v Benevento and People v Prescod. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 4:30 am by David DePaolo
This is why many people who are not trained in the vagaries of the law hate it; how do you determine what's beneficial to the employer in those close cases, like Morton v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 4:30 am by David DePaolo
This is why many people who are not trained in the vagaries of the law hate it; how do you determine what's beneficial to the employer in those close cases, like Morton v. [read post]