Search for: "People v. Finely"
Results 241 - 260
of 5,649
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
These people may be sentenced to punishment that include: A fine and up to 20 years in prison for reentry if their prior deportation was because of an aggravated felony; A fine and up to 10 years in prison for reentry if their prior deportation was because of three or more misdemeanor crimes involving (a) drugs, (b) crimes against a person, or (c) a non-aggravated felony; A fine and 2 years in prison for reentry if they were caught reentering the United… [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:22 am
” In Martin v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:01 am
[See Prigg v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
Putin ("President Vladimir V. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:25 pm
Pearson v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 2:54 pm
An excerpt from today's Appellate Court of Connecticut decision in Ambrose v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Blake & Anor v Fox [2024] EWHC 146 (KB). [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:54 pm
Mazer v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
People talk of Chevron deference as though it were binary (deference or no deference), but in practice it is not so monolithic. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:15 pm
Undercover Operations: John Stings or Reverse Stings Trying to arrest people involved in commercial sex transactions is not easy from a law enforcement perspective. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 8:45 am
Diedrich v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 10:34 am
Many people think this is true. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
McPherson v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am
The ICO has fined two home improvement companies for marketing phone calls to people on the UK’s “do not call” register. [read post]