Search for: "People v. French"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,541
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2021, 4:47 pm
In the case of Sanchez v France [2021] ECHR 724 (available only in French) the Fifth Section of the Court of Human Rights held that the conviction of a politician for failing to promptly delete unlawful comments published by third parties on the public wall of his Facebook account did not breach his Article 10 rights despite his apparent lack of knowledge of the comments. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
French diplomats reacted to the announcement with outrage. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 5:01 am
And the courts can then decide if those suits are consistent with Roe v. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:30 pm
Otto v. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 4:34 pm
African Court on Human and Peoples’ RightsXYZ v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 6:51 am
GermanyProtester v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 11:48 am
Pulte v. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 1:18 pm
California Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 6:29 am
It's been almost ten years that I attended a French Samsung v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Yahey v British Columbia, 2021 BCSC 1287 (CanLII) [1834] The Province must be taken to know the promises the Crown made to Indigenous people, and which it is bound to uphold today. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 3:51 am
” Nasrallah v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 4:33 pm
The judgment (in French), can be found here [pdf]. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 4:10 pm
An ICO investigation, prompted by complaints from the public, found the firm made repeated nuisance calls to people about PPI. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 6:41 am
I also want to wish you, and all thefriends of the people ofthe United States of America, a happy Fourth of July. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
Data is not available for 2020 and 2021. [11] Section 218 of the Act. [12] Wilkinson v Kitzinger (No 2) [2007] 1 FLR 295, per Sir Mark Potter P at [50]. [13] See paragraph 21(2)(d) of Schedule 5; paragraph 5(2)(d) of Schedule 6; and paragraph 10(3)(a) of Schedule 7. [14] GW v RW (Financial Provision: Departure from Equality) [2003] 2 FLR 108; IX v IY [2018] EWHC 3053 per Williams J at [68]; MB v EB [2019] EWHC 1649. [15] Levin, I. (2004). [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 8:43 pm
” The French version of the same text is perhaps more ambiguous, using the term “des peuples autochtones du Canada,” which could perhaps be interpreted as people who came from Canada. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:21 am
Supreme Court in Nestlé v. [read post]
