Search for: "People v. Good"
Results 241 - 260
of 22,395
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2011, 6:11 am
Wallace’s Rakofsky v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 11:08 am
Chief Judge Kozinski is very good at writing opinions that make other people look bad. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:58 am
There's good forensics evidence that suggests that you're the murderer. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 12:57 pm
This week, the European Court of Justice reaffirmed the core principle of the foundation of the European Union: the free movement of goods, services and people across national borders.The ruling trumps intellectual property rights and contract rights that would otherwise have restricted the ability to receive television broadcasts only to proper licensees within a particular member state.The case arises out of the purchase by certain pubs (restaurant/bars) in the United Kingdom of… [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:12 pm
Justice Kruger writes a pretty good introduction to this opinion, which overrules precedent and explains why. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 2:10 am
In this regard, the Court reasoned as follows:First, jurisprudence suggesting that the mental state of an alleged infringer was irrelevant usually concerned – people who did not know that the goods (containing the infringing sign) that they were selling or otherwise handling were not genuine from the trade mark proprietor rather than those who did not even know that a sign identical or similar to the trade mark existed on the goods at all. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 4:35 am
In “Pliva v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 5:49 am
See Washington v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 8:22 am
Supreme Court case in 1976, Craig v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:12 pm
See Cammack v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 12:48 pm
But shortly thereafter, the United States Supreme Court decided Maryland v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:30 pm
Too late.But, after this opinion, isn't what's good for the goose also good for the gander? [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 12:47 pm
What's good for one side seems equally good for the other. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 12:22 pm
Most people know what Title Nine entails. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 4:15 pm
The Gucci people don't like that. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 8:12 am
Thanks to the nice people at Prawfs for letting me crash on the couch for another month. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 12:24 pm
(Because goodness knows I uniformly do that, and never say anything that might incur its ire.) [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 4:24 pm
People live in it. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:04 pm
So, yep, other people have used the same term. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 1:27 pm
That's pretty damn good evidence of their intent, in my view.So if that's their intent, as evidenced by the statutory text itself, I'm cool with that. [read post]
