Search for: "People v. Hale" Results 241 - 260 of 376
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2012, 2:02 pm by Wessen Jazrawi
Lady Hale gave the leading judgment and she argued that s 177(1) now extends to harmful or abusive action at large. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:31 am by Wessen Jazrawi
Lady Hale also pointed out that the form of words used in the Age Regulations (see now the EA 2010) were intended to make it easier, rather than more difficult, to establish indirect discrimination. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 3:43 am by Russ Bensing
Hale the court found the error harmless because of “overwhelming” evidence of guilt, but just two years earlier had held in State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 5:52 pm by nflatow
Bollinger, and Grutter v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 6:11 am by Michael Scutt
In MacLennan the court focussed on four of Lady Hale’s propositions; 1. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm by INFORRM
  Thus, for example, in Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe SPRL ([2007] 1 AC 359) Baroness Hale argued that the public have a right to know only if there is “a real public interest in communicating and receiving the information. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm by Matthew Hill
Subsequent case law has found that the duty might (depending on the facts of specific cases) apply to the following situations: prison authorities protecting inmates from harm from other prisoners [Edwards v UK (2002) 36 EHRR 487], or from suicide [Keenan v UK (2001) 33 EHRR 913]; immigrants in administrative detention [Slimani v France (2006) 43 EHRR 49]; military conscripts [Lilinc V Turkey (App. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:22 am by Nick Armstrong, Matrix
One of the particular features of that case was the serious criticism which some of the members of the court directed at Baroness Hale (see for example “I totally disagree with, and deplore, Lady Hale’s suggestion . . . [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 11:36 am by Sean Gallagher
A closer look While Schmitz reveled in the attention, it wasn’t long before TÜV was wondering what, exactly, it had bought. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:13 am by Mandelman
  Even some of the people involved in the drafting of California’s Senate Bill 94 (“SB 94?) [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 2:26 am by Michael Scutt
Homer v West Yorkshire Police is about indirect age discrimination. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 11:03 am by Alasdair Henderson
Lady Hale dissented and would have found for the employees in both case. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:09 am by Dr. Stuart Baran
Lord [Sky]Walker and Lord Collins wrote the judgment of the court, with Lady Hale and Lord Phillips agreeing in full. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am by Kirsten Sjvoll, Matrix Chambers
Comment This case is significant for two reasons: First, it tasks the Supreme Court with answering the question raised obiter by Lady Hale in Savage v South Essex NHS Trust [2009] 1 AC 653, namely “what is the extent of the state’s duty to protect all people against an immediate risk of self-harm? [read post]