Search for: "People v. Jacobs"
Results 241 - 260
of 658
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2011, 12:24 pm
Speed camera ticket tossed over typo in Md. law – by Danny Jacobs James Liskow beat his speed camera ticket literally by a letter in the law. 2. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 9:05 pm
” [Capital Press, Oregon] House committee flays department over use of “hot goods” orders to arm-twist growers of perishables on labor issues [committee, CQ via Dunn Carney, The Grower] Sauce for gander: if left can push labor ordinances at county and municipal level, supporters of right-to-work laws might do the same thing [James Sherk and Andrew Kloster, Heritage] “I wonder how large the overlap is between people who want Ray Rice banished from NFL forever and… [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 6:46 am
Mengden IV PDF Note Yellowbear v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:40 pm
People v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 4:04 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 12:45 pm
“Approximately 35 to 40 percent of people in our jails read at a first or second grade level,” he explained, adding that the City has since tripled its ability to provide GEDs to those awaiting trial and is currently providing opportunities for one-fifth of people earning GEDs in prison. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 6:14 am
As the Court stated: `people living together [who] fall within some recognized hierarchy, like a household of parent and child,’ might ha [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
Session 3: The Consumer in Different Trade Mark ContextsDo the questions that we have looked at in the first two sessions vary in different trademark and adjacent contexts? [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
Generations of people in the community were poisoned by lead, arsenic and other toxic substances, resulting in a devastating array of physical and mental illnesses and in some cases, death. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 5:11 am
Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer plc [2012] [noted by the IPKat here] established that, even if most people are not deceived, passing off can still be proved. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 9:33 am
And that assumption is necessary to defend INS v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
(579) Yet, as Fulton v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 1:02 pm
Jacobs said it is not uncommon for Border Patrol to look for people as part of an immigration sting by looking for their cars. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:00 pm
Just as Roe v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:35 am
Texas, which effectively made all gay people criminals in the eyes of the law. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 4:55 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection The ICO published its annual tracking research showing that 77% of people say protecting their personal information is essential. [read post]
[David Kopel] Restoring the right to bear arms, New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen
9 Aug 2022, 9:19 am
States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:29 am
” The Washington Post reports that in the wake of District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:54 am
AskSir Robin Jacob ...Swearing in. [read post]