Search for: "People v. Little"
Results 241 - 260
of 13,283
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2022, 7:40 am
Iran and Iranians were plunged into the dark ages, where women cannot show their face in public and have little rights. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 10:39 am
I just got raked across hot coals for half of class, over a footnote in Hadley v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 11:55 am
But I'd have taken a little bit more seriously than Justice Liu does the fact that the trial court, in a capital case about sanity (at the guilt phase) and defendant's psychological problems (at the penalty phase) told the jury that "really, all the psychology stuff is mumbo jumbo stuff. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:34 pm
Or at least a little obsessive, perhaps to the detriment of the very animals I love? [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:57 pm
The trial court's error (Judge Genesta, in L.A.) was perhaps a little understandable as well -- it seems facially silly, after all, to allow such a crazy verdict --but it's nonetheless clear error regardless.Can't do that. [read post]
20 May 2008, 10:45 am
. - How about a little slam on Judge Bocanegra for upping the restitution order from $200 to $10,000 as a result of Wardell's previous successful appeal?! [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 12:47 pm
" Interesting.Fortunately, this is an area in which I've got very little to fear. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 12:11 pm
And catch the guy (and his crew) a couple days later.Which makes one think that the police perhaps might have tried a little bit harder to catch the guy before someone got killed.I know, I know: Resource constraints, limited budget, blah blah blah. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:27 am
Smartsource v Information Commissioner + 19 other parties [2010] UKUT 415 (AAC) 23rd November 2010 – read judgment Ibsen’s Enemy of the People has Dr Stockmann complaining to his Norwegian municipality about contamination of its water supply. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 7:46 am
Oyewole v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 11:50 am
Given its stock-in-trade in trashing people, I'm a little surprised we don't have more lawsuits relating to it. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 3:16 pm
I got a little scared. . . . [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:12 pm
Texas, was decided just two weeks prior to Brown, but there is another little-known case that was instrumental for the American civil rights movement: Méndez v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:58 am
We are expecting a further substantial increase in revenue this coming year, on the back of the ever-increasing business that the firm will be taking on, especially with fewer people getting legal aid. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 3:51 pm
They throw the little ones back and keep the big ones.Makes sense. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 3:51 pm
Lots of possibilities over which we need shed little concern.But other possibilities involve danger. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 12:53 pm
So maybe you get a little jaded.Yet something about the first paragraph stuck out to me:"The issue in this case is whether a defendant’s various mental conditions,1 including frotteuristic disorder, exhibitionist disorder, bipolar disorder, and anti-social disorder, which two experts opined would likely result in future acts of sexual battery, satisfy the requirement of the Sexually Violent Predator Act (SVPA) that a defendant 'will engage in sexually violent criminal… [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 9:37 am
"Devastating.The jury took just a little over an hour to find the defendant guilty of reckless driving that caused great bodily injury. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 1:05 pm
Much to the chagrin, I'd bet, of those who strongly opposed his appointment to the Court of Appeal.Second, I know that existing doctrine makes it permissible -- and it's entirely irrelevant to the Court's holding -- but do the underlying facts of the police interrogation here make you feel at least a little uncomfortable? [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 5:21 am
"Ed Johnson, the long-time Oregon Law Center lawyer in the Portland case, was also the plaintiffs’ lawyer in the recent Grants Pass case that extended the rule adopted by the Ninth Circuit in the notorious decision Martin v. [read post]
