Search for: "People v. Lopez."
Results 241 - 260
of 557
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2014, 8:33 am
Justice Burke argued that the Court had said in Rios v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 12:31 pm
Lopez-Flores, [sic] the name of which rang a bell. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:37 am
Flores-Lopez, 670 F. 3d 803, 806 (CA7 2012). [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 1:00 am
This Atlantic article highlights Wolfe v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 12:21 pm
People v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 6:19 am
’ Lopez v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:47 am
In an email, another Walmart manager instructed warehouse managers that they had to work toward reducing the number of “temp agency people in our buildings. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 2:16 pm
Lopez. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 12:42 pm
Wells Fargo utilizes one major lawfirm to sue customers in Texas: VINCENT LOPEZ SERAFINO JENEVEIN, P.C. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
Miami-Dade Judges Peter Lopez and John Thornton rounded out those on the short list.Both Bloom and Gayles are serving in the civil division.The openings were created when U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 6:35 pm
Partington v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm
(the link is to the decision that is being appealed), and my students Nathan Davis, Sara Liss, and Paulette Rodriguez-Lopez worked on the brief. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 5:23 am
People v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am
United States. 379 U.S. 241 (1964) (commerce power could be used to apply an anti-discrimination statute to an establishment that served people in interstate travel and that could affect national policy); Katzenbach v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 5:23 pm
Congress' commerce authority includes the power to regulate those activities having a substantial relation to interstate commerce as held in United States v Lopez. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 3:49 am
Shortly thereafter, the caller phoned again, believing she was speaking with Lopez-Cruz, but instead informed Soto that there were two people next to a house where there was a lot of lighting, and gave instructions to drive there, flash his high beams, and the two people would come out. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
The notice requirement is excused when a defendant moves for suppression of the identification testimony (CPL § 710.30[3]; People v Merrill, 87 NY2d 948; see also, People v Lopez, 84 NY2d 425). [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:51 pm
Shortly thereafter, the caller phoned again, believing she was speaking with Lopez, but instead informed agent Soto that there were two people next to a house where there was a lot of lighting, and gave instructions to drive there, flash his high beams, and the two people would come out.The agents arrested Lopez and followed the caller’s instructions, which led them to pick up two people, whoadmitted to being Mexican citizens without documents." [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 1:27 pm
Indiana, 452 U.S. 314, 329 n.17 (1981); United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:25 pm
People exist stacked atop each other. [read post]
