Search for: "People v. Mays (1998)" Results 241 - 260 of 2,062
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2018, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
It is, as Chief Justice John Marshall observed of the commerce power in McCulloch v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The long-awaited judgment in Khuja (formerly known as PNM) v Times Newspapers Limited is the right decision. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 9:08 am by Jeff Vail
Wiggins, 279 P.3d 1 (Colo. 2012) (quoting C.R.C.P. 45 as permitting subpoenas to request ESI); People v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 5:00 am by Terry Hart
Hollywood Reporter has more details on the latest in Lenz v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 12:57 am by INFORRM
The conduct had no ramifications beyond the three people who were affected by it. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:18 am by INFORRM
The infinite variety of situations in which issues of compliance may arise and the inevitable element of judgment involved in assessing them make complete codification impossible. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
A nice summary of the meaning of these requirements in the context of criminal law provisions was provided by Lord Hope in R (Purdy) v Director of Public Prosecutions [2010] 1 AC 345, at paragraph 41: Accessibility means that an individual must know from the wording of the relevant provision and, if need be, with the assistance of the court’s interpretation of it what acts and omissions will make him criminally liable: see also Gülmez v Turkey (Application No… [read post]