Search for: "People v. More"
Results 241 - 260
of 43,334
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2008, 4:20 am
However, in two published opinions in 2002 in the federal death penalty case of United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 12:18 pm
How Notice Works in Premises Liability Claims Continue Reading › The post Actual v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 7:29 am
Davis v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:41 am
The opinion is Sorrell v. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 10:06 am
He's already bought himself 30 years since the 1979 murder, and has probably got at least another decade or so more to go of state and federal habeas proceedings before he's realistically looking at execution of his sentence. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 12:24 pm
The Court of Appeal uses "Jane Doe" and initials, whereas the more robust newspaper story uses actual names. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 1:16 pm
"On the one hand, the crimes are (to me, at least) horrific home invasions -- plus the attempted murder of police officers while evading arrest -- and I'm more than happy for the perpetrators to be incarcerated for a relatively lengthy period of time.On the other hand, the defendant here was simply the getaway driver, and she has already served more than 14 years in prison.Whatchathink? [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 12:27 pm
In which the sentencing regime is arguably equally (if not more) complicated, equally (if not more) determinate, and which has generated its own substantial debate.For this reason, I was totally psyched for this opinion. [read post]
12 May 2009, 8:37 pm
X appeals to the NY Court of Appeals, which ruled 4-3 today (People v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 3:58 pm
But even more than the legal analysis, the underlying facts -- in what would is facially just a simple DUI with injury case -- are bizarre and depressing.I am glad that I merely read about, rather than live, that world. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 9:47 am
There is no doubt that family law touches the lives of more people than any other area of the law. [read post]
24 May 2018, 4:55 pm
In Naruto v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 9:40 am
Meuser v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:36 pm
Couldn't be more right.] [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:18 am
State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:48 am
In 2008, Eugene, Andy Koppelman, and I appeared on a Federalist Society panel on “Freedom of Speech v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 12:39 pm
Maybe we need to do a little more Westlaw training (or, perhaps, careful wordsmithing).Footnote 8 of this opinion by Justice Benke says "Appellant concedes that the term taint hearing does not occur in Westlaw's databases, current California case law, California statutes or Witkin's California Criminal Law treatise. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
It simply seems like it's rebutted in situations in which, as here, everyone agrees that the impropriety resulted in (1) an acquittal on an offense that lots of jurors thought the guy was guilty of, and (2) a conviction in which all the jurors already thought the guy was guilty (and a portion of whom were merely hoping to convict on a greater offense).The case that Justice Robie cites for prejudice in this context is People v. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 12:26 pm
And I believe that that would put him in a situation where he would be more sympathetic towards a defendant, even though there's a jury instruction right on point that they're not supposed to take into consideration sympathy for a defendant. [read post]
