Search for: "People v. Pettis"
Results 241 - 260
of 481
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 pm
Pursuant to People v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 12:26 pm
” State v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 12:26 pm
” State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 5:01 pm
I'll simply add that I'm fairly confident that the vast majority of the people who voted for Prop. 36 intended that prisoners like Mr. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 1:23 pm
Yeager v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 1:01 pm
In a 2012 decision from the Supreme Court of Canada, Dore v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 1:09 pm
Coast Guard called them for assistance at about 5:45 a.m. after the 80-foot F/V Eyak ran aground, then began to take on water about 16 miles south of Sitka. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 11:33 am
Kirkpatrick Pettis Smith Polian, Inc., 996 P.2d 771 (Colo. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 4:41 pm
An 1888 Supreme Court decision, Callan v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 5:38 pm
In People v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 8:26 am
They reported that a Good Samaritan vessel had rescued seven people in a life raft, one person was confirmed dead, and 54 were missing. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:22 pm
Sharpe and Patricia McMahonMisconceptions: Unmarried Motherhood and the Children of Unmarried Parents Act by Lori ChambersThe Alberta Supreme Court at 100: History & Authority edited by Jonathan SwaingerMy Life in Crime and Other Academic Adventures by Martin Friedland 2006Magistrates, Police & People: Everyday Criminal Justice in Quebec and Lower Canada, 1764-1837 by Donald FysonThe Court of Queen’s Bench of Manitoba 1870- 1950: A Biographical History by Dale BrawnR.C.B. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 8:27 am
She posted a follow-up comment that encouraged people to comment: “The more people we get to like this comment, the more we can brag about it. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 11:44 pm
(V) Solicitation to commit murder as defined in Section 653f. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 8:19 am
The strange little case of Zivotofsky v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 10:40 am
On the whole, the level of entries was quite painful, since many of the readers either didn't take the trouble to establish what a limerick was, or knew perfectly well what it was but decided to do their own thing, either throwing themselves at the Kats' mercy or growling contemptuously at their petty insistence on there being any rules at all. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 2:03 pm
Todd Pettys and a reply posted by Epstein et al. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 12:38 pm
Illinois Post-Conviction Relief and People v. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 11:28 am
Given the decidedly ambiguous nature of “likes” (it’s not uncommon for people to “like” obituary posts) it seems petty on the part of employers to terminate someone on the basis of liking a post. [read post]
