Search for: "People v. Powers"
Results 241 - 260
of 16,987
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2010, 5:43 pm
Much of Perry v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 10:57 pm
In order to find standing in Massachusetts v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 12:18 pm
See Tibbs v. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 1:38 pm
This storyline — and especially the way it cleverly inverted the David v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:46 pm
One, people often make incredibly bad decisions. [read post]
17 May 2011, 3:56 pm
In honor of the anniversary of Brown v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 8:30 am
” So we know on an intellectual level that “story model research” is correct when it instructs about the power of stories to persuade. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:16 pm
On 12/15/09 in People v Wrotten (a name that works), the Court of Appeals, relying on People v Cintron (75 NY2d 249 [1990]) held that permitting an adult complainant living in another state to testify via real-time, two-way video after finding that because of age and poor health he was unable to travel to New York to attend court was within the trial court's inherent powers under Judiciary Law § 2-b, absent any specific statutory authority for… [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 9:51 am
[cites to Doe v. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 12:00 am
Cuomo signed into law as Chapter 374 of the Laws of 2018 a bill permitting the "people" of New York State to pursue state charges against individuals who were "accused of federal crimes and receive a presidential pardon. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 6:45 am
Cuomo signed into law as Chapter 374 of the Laws of 2018 a bill permitting the "people" of New York State to pursue state charges against individuals who were "accused of federal crimes and receive a presidential pardon. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 7:41 am
Another recent example is BCCA Appeal Group, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 6:46 pm
In City of Austin v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:38 am
I’ve recently heard some people argue that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 — which the Supreme Court applied in Hobby Lobby — violates the separation of powers. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 8:33 am
On October 11, 2018, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Mikisew Cree First Nation v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 4:33 pm
[v] Id. at 4. [read post]
30 May 2024, 10:03 am
While the defense argued that the defendants were not guilty of subversion as subverting state power involves the use or threat of force, the court referenced HKSAR v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:28 am
Mitchell and Katzenbach v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:54 am
Two wealthy, privileged, and powerful white people squared off over thousands of acres of land acquired from Indigenous nations who called the vast valley of Eagle River home. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:56 am
Since Gibbons v. [read post]
