Search for: "People v. Saling" Results 241 - 260 of 6,216
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2023, 11:58 pm
The customer wanted a cheap policy and a "proof of insurance" form that it could show to cops and anyone else, so rather than lose the sale, the insurance company sold him the thing and issued the (false) proof of insurance.If you let that happen -- as the Court of Appeal does -- then plenty of people will do precisely that. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
One of the leading authorities in the area of promotional liability is the Weirum v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
But only last week did Biofire offer the first public sale of a smart gun. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 3:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Primer: Le Labo is a “mainstream perfumery,” not niche; owned by licensees Estee Lauder, designed by outside “nose,” who works for a “composition house” that develops perfumes for other people. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 2:13 am by Eleonora Rosati
The Court went on to find that the degrees of both visual and aural similarity between the two marks was low to medium, in all relevant territories.The Court carefully went through both parties’ sales evidence (with a fine-tooth comb, I might add!) [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 9:04 pm by News Desk
The majority of proceeds from the sale of properties will be used to pay the victims, forming part of the fund managed by the Associação das Vítimas de Intoxicação por Dietilenoglicol. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 2:32 pm by Lee E. Berlik
Lack of Capacity to Contract Some people lack the legal capacity to enter into binding agreements. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 11:42 pm by Kevin
See, e.g., “United States v. 1855.6 Pounds of American Paddlefish Meat” (Nov. 14, 2018), and the sequel, “Update: The Paddlefish Defendants Are Now for Sale (Jan. 28, 2019). [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 4:45 pm by Reference Staff
Like the Blake legislation, SB 5440 is derived from a court case, Trueblood v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 9:43 am
That the shooter had a "valid, unexpired hunting license" at the time of the sale, so was permitted to buy the weapon. [read post]