Search for: "People v. Singh"
Results 241 - 260
of 298
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2010, 11:46 am
Sidhu, Neha Singh Gohil ; [foreword by Amy Chua].Sidhu, Dawinder S.Farnham, Surrey, England ; Burlington, Vt. : Ashgate, c2009.Comparative LawK559 .W38 2010Comparative law : law, reality and society / by Alan Watson.Watson, Alan, 1933-Lake Mary, FL : Vandeplas Pub., 2010.Constitutional LawKF4550 .T873 2010Why the Constitution matters / Mark Tushnet.Tushnet, Mark V., 1945-New Haven, Conn. : Yale University Press, c2010.Constitutional LawKF4550.Z9 L578 2010Keeping faith with the… [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
In Berkoff v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 3:07 am
The trouble was that such people do smoke in the house. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:52 am
Kameri-Mbote, Migai AkechKelo v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:13 am
The Simon Singh case – one of the catalysts for the campaign – is illustrative. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 5:18 am
In Keshub Mahindra v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 3:11 am
Writing in the Guardian Simon Singh welcomes the decision. [read post]
15 May 2010, 9:34 am
Kaui Jochanan Amsterdam v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm
US Law and Media News It is reported that a study in the United States has found that young people care about privacy just as much as older people but behave more recklessly online because they think the law gives them more protection than it actually does. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:49 am
People v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 8:00 am
[Post by Venkat] State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 6:49 am
Shekhar Singh (RTI Activist), Ms. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 4:30 am
Thankfully, while Tom Watson blocks libel reform on the grounds that Parliament needs more time (Infra), the Court of Appeal has stepped in to bring a degree of sanity into libel proceedings in BCA v Dr Singh. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 11:21 pm
R. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 3:50 am
Shri Zile Singh RESPONDENTS 1. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 1:36 am
Singh U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 1:47 am
ALLEN v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:29 am
But these motives are no more to the point than the motives of the council that charged a husband for admission to their pool while letting his wife in free; this discrepancy arose out of the discriminatory pensionable age provisions and therefore the council’s entire innocent motives – of allowing people of pensionable age free admission – had a discriminatory basis (James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] 2 AC 751. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
It raises the question, which equity forces us to ask, as to why people do things. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
It raises the question, which equity forces us to ask, as to why people do things. [read post]
