Search for: "People v. Watson"
Results 241 - 260
of 335
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2011, 2:47 pm
Q: Watson—a computer that can analyze language and come up with answers—how does the deployment of tech like this change the issues? [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:10 pm
In Wynar v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 3:33 am
He is understood to have been heading for Union Street to tell people about Hollie’s case and his plans to contest the Aberdeen South parliamentary seat as an independent candidate. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:26 am
He added: “The only people I think need privacy are people who do bad things. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
Supreme Court, June 18, 2008 Munaf v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:38 am
Watson (D. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am
On the same day Ritchie J handed down judgment in the case of Armstrong Watson LLP v Persons Unknown [2023] EWHC 762 (KB) setting out his reasons for granting a without notice injunction at a private hearing in a case where the claimant law firm had been subject to a hack of its IT systems and a subsequent blackmail attempt. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 9:03 pm
” Walters highlighted that in Gundy v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 4:10 am
Her pioneering achievements will be an inspiration to people both within and outside the College, and I very much look forward to welcoming her to Oxford. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 1:18 pm
” People v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:45 am
Hon. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:54 pm
" Watson v. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 10:10 am
” Midland Hotel Corp. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 12:02 pm
Watson, the computer that competed on Jeopardy! [read post]
7 Apr 2025, 2:18 pm
Olga V. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
(Professor Brown notes the English Court of Appeal admitted this in Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd (Nos 2 – 5) [2002] 2 WLR 640 at 653.) [read post]
