Search for: "People v. Wills" Results 241 - 260 of 5,046
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2016, 8:45 am
The arrested person should provide a list of people who may be willing to cooperate to his or her lawyer. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
Millions of people (including quite a few in the legal profession) have lost their jobs. [read post]
22 Feb 2025, 6:07 pm by Josh Blackman
  But only Justice Thomas was willing to go a step further and say those precedents were wrong. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm by Donald Thompson
We should respond that these questions address the ability of a potential juror to be fair and impartial, an area of inquiry in which a trial court is more apt to commit error (see CPL § 270.20[1][b]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600 [2000]; People v Lewis, 71 AD3d 1582 [4th Dept 2010]; People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199 [4th  Dept 2006]). [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 1:01 am
Both clients are willing to sign waivers allowing waiver of any privilege the witness/client might have. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 7:05 am by Eric Goldman
” Note: The willfulness predicate for disgorgement is at issue in the Romag case pending before SCOTUS. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 12:00 pm
Marriage is a beautiful concept that many people are willing to embrace. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 5:00 am by Dan Hoerner
  Nowadays, people are more willing to embrace arbitration over formal litigation for dispute resolution because it is typically perceived as less expensive and more “user friendly. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:17 am by Eugene Volokh
To my knowledge, Google doesn't act on such expungement orders, but some newspapers and other sites might be willing to. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 10:41 am
Normally, in our free-market (or heavily regulated free-market) economy, we think that the value of a thing is set by what people are willing to pay for it. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 12:22 pm by Eugene Volokh
I was glad to see that the California Court of Appeal published its opinion in Luo v. [read post]