Search for: "People v. Wisdom"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,223
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2020, 5:50 pm
The case was Kanter v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm
Hamdi v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
First, in defiance of the reigning (or even raining if not pouring) conventional wisdom, the main political obstacle to electoral reform has not come from the smallest states. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:52 pm
We are all just too stupid to see its wisdom. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:04 pm
Supreme Court’s landmark environmental decision in Michigan v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 7:54 am
Gore, 531 U.S. 98 and Ledbetter v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
In Graham v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 10:46 am
V bad. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
How could I resist the temptation of addressing the legal issues posed by the Tweets of a “very stable genius” with “great and unmatched wisdom” who is the most powerful person in the world? [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Of course, there is the reality that the Constitution was designed by people who were profoundly antagonistic to the notion of “democracy” inasmuch as that required some genuine faith in the capacity of ordinary people to engage in what Federalist 1 described as “reflection and choice” about how we should in fact be governed. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 2:31 pm
" Moreover, "questions of the wisdom, justice, policy or expediency of a statute are for the legislature alone. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 7:21 pm
Tort law does not require the wisdom of Solomon. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 12:22 pm
Nuxoll v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 9:01 pm
In Boerne v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm
Implications: conventional wisdom doesn’t seem to match real world practice. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 9:20 pm
” (p. 9, quoting Korea Supply Co. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:24 pm
Our real-life case for today is Bradwell v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm
[Yesterday was pro-Chief Justice Roberts day on CNN. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 4:45 pm
A judicial official from Connecticut sought advice on whether he could participate in "A Silent March of Black Female Attorneys of Connecticut" by meeting the marchers at the steps of the Connecticut Supreme Court and reading Article First, Sec. 2 of the Connecticut Constitution (which sets forth that all political power is inherent in the people) if he is not introduced at the event, does not identify himself by name or title or wear court- affiliated attire, does not permit his… [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
That, at any rate, is the new conventional wisdom. [read post]
