Search for: "Perry v. State of California"
Results 241 - 260
of 786
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2013, 1:14 am
It would also undermine the argument that Perry v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:51 pm
In both cases, senior government officials (California state officials in Perry and the India's union cabinet in Naz) accepted these findings and filed no appeals. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 8:15 pm
Perry last Wednesday, the U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 8:09 am
In Perry, the state of California (represented by a guy named Hollingsworth) asked for it to be reversed, which should have kept it alive. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 1:14 am
It would also undermine the argument that Perry v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 3:37 pm
Perry. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 2:47 pm
Perry, United States Supreme Court (6/26/13)United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:54 am
If that were not enough, the Supreme Court’s companion decision, Hollingsworth v Perry, No. 12-144, decided June 26, 2013, leaves in place a determination, under California state law, that same-sex partners could not be denied the benefits of marriage. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
Perry, in which the Court held that the sponsors of California’s ban on same-sex marriage lacked standing to defend the initiative on appeal, and United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 7:17 am
With this decision, accompanied by the defeat of DOMA in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:13 am
Perry (on California’s Prop. 8). [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
Perry—because of a legal technicality, really—the District Court’s order invalidating Prop 8 stands, which means that California couples will be able to wed soon. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 12:25 pm
Perry, Howard M. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:03 am
To the surprise of no one who has been paying attention, the June 26, 2013 United States Supreme Court opinions in the cases of United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:47 am
Additionally, the High Court dismissed the companion same-sex marriage case, Hollingsworth v Perry, holding that the proponents of California’s “Proposition 8,” which amended the state constitution to define marriage as a union between a man and a woman, lacked standing to appeal a federal district court’s ruling that the ballot initiative was unconstitutional. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:05 am
Perry - The Prop 8 Case First, let's look at Hollingsworth v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:05 am
The DOMA (Section 3) case before the high court was United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 5:19 am
Am I the only one who thinks all nine justices collectively wrote both opinions in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:58 pm
Perry today, the U.S. [read post]
