Search for: "Persons v. Commissioner of Social Security"
Results 241 - 260
of 695
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:25 am
In February 2019, after representations from Mr I’s solicitors, he was moved to the highest priority band (there was only one person with higher priority for a three bed property). [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm
The Panopticon blog had a post on the CJEU announcing that judgment will be handed down in Case C-311/18, Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland & Schrems on 16 July 2020. [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:57 pm
It anticipates this will look like in-person voting. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:57 pm
Decisions this Week IndiaIn Re: Banners Placed on Roadside in the City of Lucknow v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 15 April 2020 the High Court handed down judgment in the case of Smethurst v Commissioner of Police [2020] HCA 14 holding that that the warrant the Australian Federal Police used to search News Corp journalist Annika Smethurst’s home in 2019 was invalid. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 2:40 pm
(This op-ed was first published in Just Security on April 13, 2020.) [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 8:04 am
Data collected by innovative organizations has enormous value and is and can be used to vastly improve our country and its citizens’ economic, social, and personal health, among other things. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 8:04 am
Data collected by innovative organizations has enormous value and is and can be used to vastly improve our country and its citizens’ economic, social, and personal health, among other things. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
The table of contents is as follows: DIVISION A—SECOND CORONAVIRUS PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2020 DIVISION B—NUTRITION WAIVERS DIVISION C—COVID–19 HEALTH CARE WORKER PROTECTION ACT OF 2020 DIVISION D—EMERGENCY PAID LEAVE ACT OF 2020 DIVISION E—EMERGENCY UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE STABILIZATION AND ACCESS ACT OF 2020 DIVISION F—PAID SICK DAYS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCIES AND PERSONAL AND FAMILY CARE DIVISION… [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm
Net impression is what matters, to a reasonable person in target audience. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 7:53 am
Circuit’s ruling in Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 1:49 pm
Section 17(b) mandates that if a person is paid to promote a security, then they must disclose the nature, source and amount of that compensation. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:07 am
And in her view, the Social Security Administration is even more powerful and ubiquitous than the CFPB. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court will soon hear argument on Seila Law v. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Hathi v News Corporation, heard 12 February 2020 (Nicol J) Sube v News Group Newspapers, heard 4 to 7 February 2020 (Warby J) Canada Goose Retail v Persons Unknown. [read post]
