Search for: "Peter Kent"
Results 241 - 260
of 451
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2012, 6:31 am
” Coverage and commentary comes from the Associated Press, Hillary Stemple at JURIST, and Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 8:30 am
On July 4 weekend, 2004, I picked up the book, SEO for Dummies, by Peter Kent. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 8:00 am
Peter Kuitenbrouwer reports for the National Post (Canada):Police in Chatham-Kent, Ont., announced Wednesday that, of 1,986 people arrested so far this year, 203 were Aries, whereas just 139 were Sagittarius. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW.Driesen, David M. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm
Peter Odell Campbell, Univ of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign: The Procedural Queer: Substantive Due Process, Lawrence v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 10:24 am
[JURIST] Canadian Minister of the Environment Peter Kent [official profile] announced Monday that Canada will withdraw [statement] from the Kyoto Protocol [text; JURIST news archive] on climate change, making it the first country to do so. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 8:58 am
Canada’s current Environment Minister, Peter Kent, previously stated that the government does not intend to agree to a second, post-2012, commitment period under Kyoto. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 6:04 am
v=yCdZje Blagojevich sentenced to 14 years in prison (http://msnbc.com) http://bit.ly/uJBllq Peter MacKay may sue over helicopter ride criticism http://bit.ly/uTrJHm UK’s top court to make Assange ruling by Christmas http://bit.ly/vuS4QV Harsh Gay Marriage Criminalization Bill Introduced In Nigerian House - http://bit.ly/uknBjs Conservative Environment Minister Kent tells UN climate conference that 'Kyoto, for Canada, is in the… [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 12:57 am
Kent has some work to do. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm
The Joint Committee for Privacy and Injunctions heard from four bloggers this week: Paul Staines aka Guido Fawkes; Don’t Get Fooled Again author Richard Wilson; Holy Moly’s Jamie East; and David Allen Green, blogger at New Statesman and Jack of Kent. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 6:24 am
Peter Goldberger – Kent: Your query (“Where else in American law can a judgment in favor of a party who did nothing wrong be reversed for the failings of opposing counsel? [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 8:06 am
” Its members include Wall Street titans like Pete Peterson and Robert Rubin; deficit-hawk groups like the CRFB, the Concord Coalition, the Hamilton Project, the Committee for Economic Development, Third Way and the Bipartisan Policy Center; budget wonks like Peter Orszag, Alice Rivlin, David Walker and Douglas Holtz-Eakin; red state Democrats in Congress like Mark Warner and Kent Conrad, the bipartisan “Gang of Six” and what’s left of the Blue Dog… [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Costello, Robbing Peter to Pay paul: The Conflict of Interest Problem in Sibling Class Actions, 21 Geo. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:25 am
Environment Minister Peter Kent recently announced that the Federal Government will no longer be providing the funding that has always made up the bulk of the CEN’s budget. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Costello, Robbing Peter to Pay paul: The Conflict of Interest Problem in Sibling Class Actions, 21 Geo. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 12:00 am
A committee from Brookings and the university will review the proposals.The AVF program is under the direction of law Dean Kent D. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 4:43 am
Peter Victor, Dr. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:38 am
Earlier this year, Environment Minister Peter Kent stated in the House of Commons that the federal government was going to look more carefully at shale gas extraction, and in particular the impact of fracturing technology. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 10:19 pm
Earlier this year, Environment Minister Peter Kent stated in the House of Commons that the federal government was going to look more carefully at shale gas extraction, and in particular the impact of fracturing technology. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 8:56 am
Finally, at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger suggests that the reasoning behind the grant in the habeas case Wood v. [read post]
