Search for: "Peters v. The State of Texas" Results 241 - 260 of 628
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2017, 3:16 am by Dennis Crouch
(Daily.2016.Professors) Tristan Gray–Le Coz and Charles Duan, Apply It to the USPTO: Review of the Implementation of Alice v. [read post]
18 Feb 2017, 4:37 am by Jordan Brunner
Josh Blackman studied the reasoning of the Ninth Circuit’s panel opinion in Washington v. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 4:53 am by Jordan Brunner
Quinta posted the recording of the Ninth Circuit oral argument from Washington v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 11:07 am by Jordan Brunner
Quinta flagged the livestream of the Texas Law Review symposium on Tallinn 2.0. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 10:01 pm by News Desk
Supreme Court decides to take up the appeals of Austin “Jack” and Peter DeCoster v. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 9:31 pm by RegBlog
  Still Seeking Contraceptive Compromise After Zubik v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am by John Elwood
United States silly-case-name award. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 9:13 am by Legal Talk Network
Peter Asaro is a philosopher of science, technology, and media. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:23 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
JonesCase Number: 15-cv-00438 (United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas)Date Filed: June 10, 2015Date of Qualifying Order/Judgment: March 21, 2016 4/29/2016 7/28/2016 2016-56 SEC v. eCareer Holding, Inc., eCareer, Inc., Joseph J. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 7:20 pm by Peter Reap
Peter ReapCCHThe federal district court in Tyler, Texas, correctly construed the term “mountable” in a patent for a digital picture frame asserted by Profectus Technology against the manufacturers and sellers of tablet computer devices as “having a feature for mounting,” the U.S. [read post]
26 May 2016, 9:29 pm by Ron Coleman
Speakers: Glynn Lunney, Texas A&M University School of Law (United States) vs. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:57 am by Amy Howe
Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Amy Howe
United States and the judicial-recusal case Williams v. [read post]