Search for: "Philip v. State" Results 241 - 260 of 2,311
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2021, 9:26 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court on the Second Amendment to right to bear arms, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 8:40 am by INFORRM
We also learn that Sir Philip Green, the perennial Pantomime villain, is also guilty of using his legally obtained wealth to legally purchase property using legal means of doing so. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 5:16 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
To evaluate this argument the Judge first assessed the current state of the UK market. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
As its name suggests, the case concerned the will of Prince Philip, who died on 9 April 2021. [read post]
” In Mah Kiat Seng, Philip Jeyaretnam JC confirmed that the common law public interest immunity remains part of Singapore law. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 3:10 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  However, "expedition will only be justified on the basis of real, objectively viewed urgency" and "commercial certainty needs to be evaluated in its proper context" (James Petter v EMC Europe [2015] EWCA Civ 480).In the context of expedition of patent trials to avoid the German injunction gap, Mr Justice Birss (as he then was) in Nicoventures Trading Limited v Philip Morris & or [2020] EWHC 1594 added three points to… [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
At the same time, he was putting pressure on the state’s Secretary of State and on the U.S. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 4:15 am by SHG
The hope is that buying a couple more months will give states time to distribute COVID relief monies to tenants to prevent mass evictions. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 6:36 am by Florian Mueller
Haier is not a proper application of EU case law, the standard of review for staying an injunction in Germany is that there must be clear reversible error, and following the nation's highest court (with respect to almost every patent case, as it's very rare that any issues reach the Federal Constitutional Court) can't constitute a clear error.Without stating on a totally definitive basis that she recognizes Sisvel v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
Lawrence Sanders, State University of New York at Buffalo. [read post]