Search for: "Pike v. State"
Results 241 - 260
of 293
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2009, 3:51 pm
Besides testing the law’s impact on capital and business form, the new petition asks the Court to clarify how far states must go to prove that there are local benefits that outweigh any burden a business-regulating law imposes on commerce among the states — essentially, a plea for the Court to revisit its most important precedent on that issue: Pike v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 1:41 pm
McCooey and State Farm, 2320-2008-Civil (Pike Co. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 12:04 pm
") AC29552 - Pike v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 3:49 pm
This week, an appeals court ruled on the latest case to come down the pike (er, the tracks) - Bacic v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 2:49 pm
Commw. 2006), and Foley v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 10:32 pm
In Lux Traffic Controls Ltd v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 4:55 pm
Section 4581(e) in the case of Gaudio v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 4:08 am
Chelak of the Pike County Court of Common Pleas, issued a three page Order that reads like an opinion in the case of Jannone v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 8:26 am
The information secured on the recent Pike County verdicts is, as follows:PIKE COUNTY VERDICTS(Updated 5/4/09)MCGINNIS V. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 9:00 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 8:04 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKBusiness Law
Share Holding Firm Fails to State Claim In Challenge to Proxy, Company's Liquidation
DCML LLC v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 6:54 pm
" And so it is with Carnegie Mellon University and Three Rivers Biologicals v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 4:58 pm
§ 524(a) makes a state-court judgment void ab initio when entered against a debtor whose dischargeable debts had been discharged, or whether the Rooker-Feldman doctrine compels federal courts to respect the state-court judgment. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:40 pm
Webb v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 9:43 pm
For example, in Micron Technology, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 11:53 am
Furthermore, neither the plaintiff nor the Barket defendants could have justifiably relied on whatever representation the deed may have contained (see Verschell v Pike, 85 AD2d 690, 691, 445 N.Y.S.2d 489). [read post]
20 May 2008, 7:28 am
Along with last term's decision in United Haulers Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 9:22 am
The verdict was returned late on Friday in the case of State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 4:54 pm
FCC v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:45 am
If facially neutral (2) use Pike Balancing - (a) Does the state have a legitimate interest in the regulation? [read post]
