Search for: "Pooler v. State"
Results 241 - 260
of 307
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2011, 9:01 am
The answer is no.The case is El Sayed v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 7:12 am
Constitution.The case is Hollander v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 7:51 am
Ricci v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 6:13 am
The case is Rivera v. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 4:44 pm
In an August 24, 2018 opinion in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
The case is Hayden v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 10:01 am
In the 7-4 decision, the Court of Appeals cites executive authority and national security concerns in declining to extend Bivens liability in this context.The case is Arar v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 6:03 am
This case asks when the arbitration "agreement" in a consumer transaction can be invalidated.The case is Soliman v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 6:46 am
In dismissing this claim, the district court stated that "[a]lthough the Second Circuit has not ruled on whether a private right of action exists under Title IX for claims of employment discrimination, '[a]n overwhelming majority of district courts in this Circuit have found that an implied private right of action does not exist[] under Title IX for employees alleging gender discrimination in the terms and conditions of their employment.'" The Court of Appeals… [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 10:27 pm
Maybe not.The case is Selevan v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:57 am
From Doe 107 v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 3:21 pm
The Department of Justice, the FTC, and 34 states–led by Vermont, California, and Florida—had filed briefs with the court, calling for en banc review. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 6:58 am
In this case, the Second Circuit (Cabranes, Raggi and Pooler) reverses summary judgment, stating, "the District Court erred in holding that plaintiff’s proof that defendants’ explanation was false was 'immaterial' because she had not introduced additional, independent evidence of discrimination. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 4:37 pm
In Raniere v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 12:00 pm
Hayes, Lisa Lehner, Christine Lopez-Acevedo, Louis V. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 12:37 pm
Several Interesting per curiams rounded out 2011:In United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:13 am
Thus, to the extent that any state court failed to afford relief for prejudicial error, that oversight would be contrary to both the federal and state standard, and could be dealt with on case by case review.In dissent from the denial of in banc review, Judge Jacobs writes on behalf of Judges Pooler, Lynch and Chin in stating that the Second Circuit needs to iron out these dual ineffective assistance standards. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:02 am
Evans v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 6:32 am
The case is K.L. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 1:00 am
The Second Circuit’s decision in Agrawal is puzzling if not downright shocking to those familiar with the Second Circuit’s decision last April in United States v. [read post]
