Search for: "Post v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue"
Results 241 - 260
of 340
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am
We omitted a statement in open court the week before last – on 4 November 2016 before Dingemans J in the case of Suresh v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
Part of Just Security’s work on accountability and election law. [read post]
30 May 2016, 1:52 am
V. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 2:23 pm
After a decline in revenues from the team's trade mark licences in 2000, an agreement was negotiated between the teams and Reebok International. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 8:02 pm
Buying Kosher or Halal products doesn’t result in a tax break, even if you’re doing it for a power higher than the Internal Revenue Service. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:31 am
From Edward Snowden to Luxembourg The case, Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC vacates FTC’s decision that Rambus breached antitrust duty by violating JEDEC patent disclosure rules and orders new trial: (Philip Brooks), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (IP Law360), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Hal Wegner), (IPBiz), (IP Law360), UK Court of Appeal rules on whether prior art not in the same design field… [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 9:49 pm
Since the IRS is not a party to this proceeding and in any event would not be bound by any determination of this court under Commissioner v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 5:25 pm
Buying Kosher or Halal products doesn’t result in a tax break, even if you’re doing it for a power higher than the Internal Revenue Service. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
Ranch royalty rate survey (IP finance) FreePatentsOnline: a remarkable symmetry - 'Flash of Genius' sponsorship of Patent Plaque Program (IP finance) Managing external patent specialists (Innovationpartners) The first step to generating revenue from 'patent monetisation' is understanding what the term means (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Think business cannot predict the future? [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Record labels sue Baidu over providing links to file-sharing sites: (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360), (Copyfight), Merck’s Fosamax patent expires: Watson Pharmaceuticals to distribute authorized generic version, Teva and Barr also launch FDA approved generic versions: (SmartBrief), (Patent Circle), (In … [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm
The judgement of HHJ Moloney QC in the curious international harassment case of Power Places Tours Inc & Ors v Free Spirit [2015] EWHC 3886 (QB) given on 10 December 20 [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
, 20-21 May: US ACI ‘In-house counsel forum on pharmaceutical antitrust’ – Maryland: (Orange Book Blog), 26-27 May : EU Workshop for mediators in IP disputes – Geneva: (IPR-Helpdesk), 27 May: Oliver Rivers to give short talk on ‘spurious precision’ – London: (IP finance), 28 May / 11June: US PLI ‘Advanced patent licensing 2008: What you need to know before licensing your patent’ – New… [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
Lopehandia, (2004) 71 OR (3d) 416 (C.A.), the Ontario Court of Appeal granted a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from disseminating, posting on the Internet or publishing further defamatory statements concerning Barrick or its officers, directors or employees. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 8:40 am
The evolution of sophisticated “insurtech” managing general agents requiring fronting insurance company relationships has also driven the demand for more creative, international reinsurance solutions. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:04 pm
We had a post about the decision. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 9:40 am
(See Higgins v Commissioner, 312 U. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 12:01 pm
In Turner v. [read post]
