Search for: "Powers v. State"
Results 241 - 260
of 40,662
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2021, 12:36 pm
On Tuesday in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 8:00 am
United States. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 8:22 am
Case citation: State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 9:04 am
Scotusblog features filings in the case of Medellin v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 1:11 pm
Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:29 pm
ShareOn Tuesday in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
In Barenblatt v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 12:08 am
Medellin v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 10:55 am
Shelby County v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 3:08 am
That is the question before the Court this morning in Bond v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 8:20 am
In Leser v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:15 pm
United States, which began as a ‘lover’s triangle’ dispute from Pennsylvania but has mushroomed into a major test of the power of Congress to implement international treaties in ways that may interfere with the prerogatives of the 50 states. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 12:22 pm
In a similar vein, in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 8:15 am
United States and Dalmazzi v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 4:07 pm
In a very rare outcome, in the case of R (Davis and ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin) the Divisional Court declared that the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 (DRIPA) is inconsistent with European Union law and therefore is “disapplied”, although the Court suspended the effect of its order until after 31 March 2016. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 12:07 am
I am currently in the process of drafting an amicus brief in the Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 7:33 am
ABSTRACT: For many commentators, Chae Chan Ping v.... [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
Morrison (2000) and United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am
Court of Appeal decision In R (Bancoult No 2) v Foreign Secretary [2007] EWCA Civ 498, the Court of Appeal held that the Immigration Order was an abuse of power because they permanently excluded an entire population from their homeland for reasons unrelated to the population’s wellbeing. [read post]
