Search for: "Powers v. Taylor"
Results 241 - 260
of 870
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2019, 4:56 am
District Court for the Northern District of California decision to issue a preliminary injunction in East Bay Sanctuary et al. v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 8:14 am
Molly Reynolds and Margaret Taylor explained the investigative powers that the House of Representatives would gain by initiating impeachment proceedings. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 3:10 am
Another case, Taylor v Hammondsport CSD, 267 A.D.2d 987, brought by a teacher following his being involuntarily reassigned to non-teaching duties, was also characterized by the court as being "an action in the nature of mandamus. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:32 am
Within Alphonse v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 12:31 pm
On December 13, 2021, in Jinks v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 4:29 am
Golf Co. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2019, 4:34 am
He also shared the Department of Justice’s amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 4:39 am
Taylor, a significant chapter in the story of contemporary habeas law. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 3:38 pm
Taylor, 192 N.Y. 398 (1908); State v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 1:00 am
Road Accident Fund v Taylor and other matters [2023] ZASCA 64 (8 May 2023) [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 6:04 pm
" Edna Taylor v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 9:00 pm
Taylor's mother does. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 2:55 pm
It convinced the trial court (Judge Taylor, down here in San Diego, who's very bright but also definitely a stickler for details), after all. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
The Secret Advantages of Judge Taylor's Opinion in ACLU v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:45 am
Officer Pacatte handed Brownwood Detective Joe Aaron Taylor a plastic sack that had the items in it. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 10:24 am
by Dennis Crouch In the trademark case of Great Concepts, LLC v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:41 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:25 am
The Court ruled that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then the civil service commission becomes and is the actual appointing power [People v Mosher, 163 NY 32]. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 10:25 am
’” Sands, Taylor & Wood Co. v. [read post]
