Search for: "President Judge Determination Cases"
Results 241 - 260
of 9,270
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2024, 6:09 am
Washington, which sets out the test to determine whether a lawyer’s performance was so inadequate that it violated the Constitution, in the case of death row inmate Danny Lee Jones. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 12:55 pm
None of the Supreme Court cases, either pre- or post-1952, rely upon reasonable expectation of success as a determinative factor in assessing the obviousness of an invention. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
The Appointments Clause provides that the President “shall appoint Ambassadors, other Public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States…. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 5:23 am
Judge Engoron’s opinion states that “When HCC became aware of the claims, its underwriter determined that the exposure on the risk was significantly higher than it had been priced at and offered a renewal policy at more than five times the existing premium. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
‘Common understanding’ has ceased to be the reliance in matters calling for essentially scientific determination. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 4:29 am
If such a request is made, a panel of five judges considers whether the case deserves further examination. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
The Supreme Court’s response will have a significant impact on whether and when Trump goes on trial in Washington, where the presiding judge has already postponed a planned March 4 start date. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
” In response to Justice Kagan’s concern, Jason Murray (counsel for the Anderson respondents) wisely signaled that it’s not the plaintiffs’ objective to have Colorado, or Wisconsin, or Michigan, unilaterally determine Trump’s eligibility: They brought this case so that the Supreme Court itself could made a definitive, uniform determination for the nation. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 1:23 pm
Disney President Michael Ovitz walked away with a $130 million severance payment after just over a year of work. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
They find text relevant but not necessarily determinative. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 4:47 am
The case is being led by the legal team of the Hostage and Missing Families Forum, an Israeli nongovernmental organization advocating for the hostages’ release, and the Canada-based Raoul Wallenberg Center for Human Rights. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
Capitol, but also former president Donald Trump, whose four-count indictment in a case pending in the U.S. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
That Trump isn’t covered by Section 3 because the President is not an “officer of the United States” and because Trump (and he alone among all Presidents and Vice Presidents) never served in another covered state or federal office. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 11:26 am
Hur’s concern was to decide whether he could likely prove a criminal offense against Biden beyond a reasonable doubt, not to determine how sympathetic or well-meaning Biden in fact is, or to diagnose whether Biden is in fact elderly and suffers from a poor memory. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 4:41 am
“The government believes it is up to the State to determine its foreign policy [sic] … in the meantime, the government will consult with international partners within the F-35 programme very soon in order to secure the Netherlands’ role within the programme,” the statement said. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
A steadier measure of how any decision will be judged is current market practice of the company’s peers and competitors. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
For example, Justice Brett Kavanaugh repeatedly invoked Griffin’s Case, in which Chief Justice Salmon Chase, acting in his capacity as a lower court judge, ruled that Section 3 is not operative absent legislation by Congress. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:46 am
The case provides an excellent example of the mistaken starting point that brackets that putatively determinate legal interpretation will generally leave an out. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm
Trump, No. 23-3228, in which the court (Judges Henderson, Childs, and Pan) held that “any executive immunity that may have protected [Trump] while he served as President no longer protects him against this prosecution. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 9:58 am
Jason Murray stated the issue plainly: If this Court concludes that Colorado did not have the authority to exclude President Trump from the presidential ballot on procedural grounds, I think this case would be done, but I think it could come back with a vengeance because ultimately members of Congress may have to make the determination after a presidential election if President Trump wins about whether or not he is disqualified from office and whether to count… [read post]
