Search for: "Price v. Phillips" Results 241 - 260 of 337
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2011, 9:39 am by WSLL
Phillips, Wyoming Attorney General; Terry L. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:05 am by Chris Stott, Pannone LLP
Lord Phillips and Lady Hale, considered similar questions in relation to the meaning of ‘benefit’ in confiscation cases (albeit in relation to the preceding statutory regime under Criminal Justice Act 1988) relatively recently as Law Lords in CPS v Jennings [2008] UKHL 29. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
In the recent case of Phillips Roberts (Liquidator of Onslow Ditching Ltd) v (1) Peter Frohlich (2) Godfrey Spanner [2011] EWHC 257 (Ch), the High Court was asked to decide whether the respondent directors had breached their fiduciary duties by continuing with a land development project when it was not in the best interests of the company or its creditors. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm by Editor
Jay also founded Prefix, LLC, which helps lawyers and clients value and price legal services. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm by Editor
Jay also founded Prefix, LLC, which helps lawyers and clients value and price legal services. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 3:47 pm
Phillips & Brooks/Gladwin, Inc., 529 F.3d 1364, 1376 (Fed. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 12:04 am by war
It looks like they would also do away with all the problems of the “threshold” requirement introduced by Phillips v Mirabella (the nature of the problem is laid out at paragraphs 19 to 27 of Bristol-Myers Squibb v Faulding). [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:52 am by Lyle Denniston
Phillips of the Washington office of  Sidley Austin. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:56 pm by INFORRM
       CLAIRE POWELL v KATIE PRICE  19/3/2010 38. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 4:12 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Ed. 2d 868 (2009), require that a complaint in federal court allege facts sufficient to show that the case is plausible, see, e.g., Phillips v. [read post]