Search for: "Price v. State Bar"
Results 241 - 260
of 2,549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2011, 10:22 am
” Wilson v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 12:36 pm
And the rule that Title VII precludes discrimination on the basis of every stereotype of what a woman supposedly should be—including each of those stated above—has existed since the Supreme Court issued Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:24 pm
Price Waterhouse, 84 N.Y.2d 535, 541, 644 N.E.2d 1009 (1994))); Shumsky v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 12:34 pm
Last week in Roman v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 10:51 am
Dalian Meisen Woodworking Co v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 4:40 am
The dispute in Rosen v Triebenbacher arose between the two fifty-percent members of Barrier Island Enterprises LLC (“BIE”), which owns and operates several beachside restaurants and bars in Long Beach Island, New Jersey, including Kubel’s Too Restaurant and Bar. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:26 pm
See United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:57 am
” At Rewire.News, Imani Gandy explores the implications for the cases of a 1989 case, Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:45 am
Veera v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 8:22 am
Affirming dismissal in Z Technologies v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:45 pm
In Shell v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:38 am
Corp. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 7:05 am
Perfect Body Image * The Florida Bar Regulates, But Doesn’t Ban, Competitive Keyword Ads * Rounding Up Three Recent Keyword Advertising Cases–Comphy v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 5:34 am
Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
Citing Thompson v. 1800-Contacts, the court finds antitrust standing among consumers who possibly paid higher prices due to the restrictions on keyword ads: Plaintiff has alleged that Defendants agreed to manipulate paid search results so that when a cons [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 7:05 am
Having a bar passage rate above your state’s average doesn’t take into account the quality of people your state allows to sit for the bar. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 4:31 am
See Unifund CCR Partners v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:00 am
U-Haul and Hall v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:19 am
Under Federal anti-trust law, the customers of the plaintiffs – the ones who actually paid the net increased prices caused by the defendants’ price-fixing – are barred from suing the manufacturers. [read post]
