Search for: "Price v. State of Illinois" Results 241 - 260 of 834
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2018, 12:51 pm by Amy Howe
Wall for petitioner (Art Lien) Arguing for Apple, lawyer Daniel Wall told the justices that the iPhone users’ claim is exactly the kind of claim that is prohibited under the Supreme Court’s 1977 decision in Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
In this case, EPSA argued that the Illinois law was preempted by the Federal Power Act because the subsidies indirectly regulated the price of power, which only FERC has the authority to regulate. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 7:05 am by Deborah Heller
Apple initially moved to dismiss under Illinois Brick for failure to state a claim other than a pass through injury. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:37 pm by Jennifer Mersing
The New York program is similar to the Illinois program, with variations in the pricing of zero emissions credits (ZECs). [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:37 pm by Jennifer Mersing
The New York program is similar to the Illinois program, with variations in the pricing of zero emissions credits (ZECs). [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:05 am by Jennifer Mersing
  The price of a ZEC will drop if an Illinois-set market-price index (based on the annual average energy prices in the PJM auction and two of the state’s regional energy markets) exceeds $31.40 per MWh. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:05 am by Jennifer Mersing
  The price of a ZEC will drop if an Illinois-set market-price index (based on the annual average energy prices in the PJM auction and two of the state’s regional energy markets) exceeds $31.40 per MWh. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 9:09 am by Scott H. Kimpel and Candace L. Moss
Department of Revenue of Illinois), which held that under the Constitution, states could not require businesses to collect sales tax unless they had a physical presence in the state. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Mark Walsh
In the center section of the public gallery, Illinois state worker Mark Janus is here, awaiting a decision in Janus v. [read post]