Search for: "Prior v. State" Results 241 - 260 of 48,143
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2011, 10:16 am by Richard Samp - Guest
SCOTUSblog deserves considerable thanks for putting together this symposium about United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 3:23 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Great Plains Brief State Brief Great Plains Reply State Reply Prior post here. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:17 am by drdiekman
Practice point: An account stated is an agreement between parties to an account based on prior transactions between them with respect to the correctness of the account items and balance due. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 10:30 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
See Mustang Pipeline Co., 134 S.W.3d at 199-200 (concluding that when contract stated time was of the essence and one party failed to perform, other party was excused from performance as a matter of law); see also Fedgess Shopping Cntrs., Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
That was the main takeaway from the recent Federal Circuit case, Research Foundation of State University of New York v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 8:21 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Congress drew it, for state priors, by the maximum penalty the state has chosen to impose for that crime. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:19 am by Amy Howe
That is the question before the Court this morning in the case of James Castleman, in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 3:04 am
The Court rejected the argument that a prior record of convictions has no bearing on the seriousness of an offense, and that the "maximum" punishment for a prior conviction should be the punishment unenhanced to account for prior convictions. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 8:32 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
Prior to 1933, United States Treasury bonds contained standard "gold clauses" stating that the bondholder would be repaid in gold dollars. [read post]
7 May 2020, 4:15 am by Rebecca Tapscott
On May 5, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) reversed a decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in Uber Technologies, Inc., v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 11:00 am by Matthew Tokson
 The article looks at the state of Fourth Amendment law following the Supreme Court’s groundbreaking 2018 opinion in Carpenter v. [read post]