Search for: "Procter and Gamble Co"
Results 241 - 260
of 326
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2013, 1:34 pm
& Pat.App. 1961) and first applied, albeit not by name, in Procter & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 3:18 am
The only reason Imus is off the air, and it’s not a censorship issue, or even relevant whether Imus is really a racist or just playing one for laughs that only he and his cohorts find amusing, is because of the marketplace.Had American Express Co., Sprint Nextel Corp., Staples Inc., Procter & Gamble Co., and General Motors Corp. not decided to pull advertising to distance their brands from the show, would MSNBC and CBS really have listened to and acted… [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 2:13 pm
” Currently, the DTSA has 92 co-sponsors in the House and 15 in the Senate. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 10:00 am
& Pat.App. 1961) and first applied, albeit not by name, in Procter & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:00 am
Procter & Gamble Co., 69 F.4th 1093 (9th Cir. 2023), where the court held that a consumer product manufacturer could rely on an ingredients list panel located on the back of the challenged product packaging to determine whether an ambiguous phrase on the front label was misleading or deceptive. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist) Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC Supreme Court: Canwest v Horizon… [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:52 pm
Procter & Gamble Mfg. [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:53 am
The authors also go on to tell of companies such as Boeing, BMW, and Procter & Gamble that have been around for the better part of a century, and yet these organizations and their leaders have seized on collaboration and self-organization as powerful new levers to cut costs, innovate faster, co-create with customers and partners, and generally do whatever it takes to usher their organizations into the twenty-first-century business environment. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
The Department of Justice Antitrust Division and Federal Trade Commission issued new draft Merger Guidelines on July 19 that aim to significantly increase scrutiny of merger activity. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., 731 F. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 1:15 pm
Procter Gamble Co. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 10:51 am
Procter & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 3:47 pm
Procter & Gamble Co. (1993) 18 Cal.App.4th 644, 655-656 (Caro).) [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 9:33 am
Procter & Gamble Co., 105 Cal.App. 4th 496, 507 (2003). [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 6:24 am
Loftin, discussed here), or from post-trial juror interviews (as in the recent Procter & Gamble/Amway verdict), or from articles the jurors wrote (like New Jersey state senator Robert Martin), the point is what the juror said, not where he chose to say it. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 1:12 pm
Marc Pritchard, Chief Brand Officer of Procter & Gamble Co. has been a vocal advocate of media transparency issues, stating earlier this year that “the days of giving digital a pass are over … It’s time to grow up. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 4:30 pm
Byrne, Director of Communications, Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP Andrea Christman, Business Manager - Tax Group, Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Laura Colcord, Co-Developer, Lead Instructor, LSSO's Process Improvement Certification Courses Timothy B. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 1:12 pm
Marc Pritchard, Chief Brand Officer of Procter & Gamble Co. has been a vocal advocate of media transparency issues, stating earlier this year that “the days of giving digital a pass are over … It’s time to grow up. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 7:17 am
Procter & Gamble Co., 799 F.3d 497, 525 (6th Cir. 2015); Mullins v. [read post]
