Search for: "QUARRELS v. STATE"
Results 241 - 260
of 315
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2015, 5:49 am
In Massachusetts v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 11:32 pm
United States, 267 U.S. 132. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:31 am
R (on the application of AM) v Secretary of State for [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
That is precisely what five other states do, and no one—even the Arizona elected legislature—seems to quarrel with that. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
That is precisely what five other states do, and no one—even the Arizona elected legislature—seems to quarrel with that. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 11:08 pm
State of Gujarat, AIR1975 SC 1234; and Shyam Kishore & Ors. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
He relegates to a single brief mention the Supreme Court’s summary affirmance in Bluman v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm
Pacific Palisades Residents Association, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 12:04 pm
The United States opposes preclearance of the redistricting plans for Texas’s congressional delegation and the State House of Representatives, but has no quarrel with the plan for the Texas Senate. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 11:26 am
In Hunter v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
While not directly comparable, this is similar to the position affirmed by the Court in Gillette v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:31 am
Bull and Carmell v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 12:09 pm
And so begins State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:12 am
Manohar Reddy and Another v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 2:57 pm
They cite Maryland v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 3:19 pm
The court has no quarrel with the Gustafsons’ wish for a birth certificate devoid of such information. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 8:44 pm
In State v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 8:39 am
D.P. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 8:39 am
D.P. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 3:27 pm
Hood v. [read post]
