Search for: "Quick v. United States" Results 241 - 260 of 2,408
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2017, 11:03 am by Kent Scheidegger
From the Interesting Stuff Stumbled Upon While Looking For Something Else File comes United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 9:46 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
United States, Lopez, the plaintiff, sought monetary damages from the United States government after an accident that she was involved in with a postal employee. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 10:46 am by aallwash
While we haven’t learned much about the FISC’s legal interpretation of these two key provisions, here’s a brief guide to what we do know:  Section 702 Title VII, Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), “Procedures for targeting certain persons outside the United States other than United States persons” (50 USC § 1881a) Allows for targeting of communications of foreign persons located… [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:53 pm by Sheppard Mullin
PSKS, Inc.,[1] the United States Supreme Court decided in a 5-4 vote to overrule the long-lived rule in Dr. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Since that CFIUS determination, lawmakers in a growing number of U.S. states have been quick to introduce and, in some cases, pass legislation that restricts foreign ownership of land within their states by governments, individuals, and/or entities associated with certain identified “foreign adversaries” of the United States. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 11:08 am by Bill Marler
According to the CDC, it is estimated that 1.4 million cases of salmonellosis occur each year in the United States. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 8:30 pm by Ben Sheffner
United States, 473 U.S. 207 (1985), that the National Stolen Property Act, 18 U. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 10:34 am by Eugene Volokh
” From United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 7:06 am by Walter James
EPA, out of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 6:08 am by Bradley Graveline
On June 17, 2013, the United States Supreme Court announced a rule that blurs the lines between antitrust and patent law in the context of Hatch-Waxman litigation. [read post]