Search for: "R. v. R."
Results 241 - 260
of 145,091
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2009, 2:41 am
R (M) v East Sussex County Council; [2009] WLR(D) 141 “The failure by a local education authority to amend a child's statement of special educational needs during the year of the child's transfer between phases of schooling, and to name and specify the type of school, was a breach of its obligations under s 324 of [...] [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 1:24 am
R (Coleman) v Governor of Wayland Prison and another; [2009] WLR (D) 132 “While a mobile telephone found in the possession of a prisoner might properly be taken away from him, neither rule 43(5) of the Prison Rules 1999 nor the common law provided a prison governor with power to destroy the mobile telephone. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 12:35 pm
R. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 2:26 am
R v Carpenter [2011] EWCA Crim 2568; [2011] WLR (D) 328 “In cases of joint enterprise where the use of a particular weapon was foreseen but the secondary party did not share or foresee the intention with which it was used, the availablity of manslaughter remained as a possible alternative verdict to murder.” WLR Daily, 11th November 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 2:35 am
Ahmed and others v HM Treasury (JUSTICE intervening); al-Ghabra v Same; R (Youssef) v Same “In introducing a test of reasonable suspicion that a person was involved in terrorism as the basis for making an asset-freezing order against him under the Terrorism (United Nations Measures) Order 2006 the Treasury exceeded its powers under the enabling provisions of s 1 of the United Nations Act 1946. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:32 pm
R. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 6:02 pm
R. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 7:26 am
July 11, 2023) The post Reddit Defeats Lawsuit Over Removal of r/WallStreetBets Moderator’s Privileges–Rogozinski v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 5:08 am
United States v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 5:30 pm
Earlier today, the Supreme Court released its decision in R v J.A, the case involving an Ottawa man convicted for sexually assaulting his partner during a round of consensual erotic asphyxiation by tying her hands behind her back while she was unconscious and then inserting a dildo into her anus as she was regaining consciousness. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:10 pm
R. was going through a divorce when his soon to be ex-wife accused him of damaging her vehicle. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 6:45 am
Munn, Jr. and Law Offices of Roger R. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 8:09 am
Logan (“Logan”) and his law firm, James R. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 10:54 am
On the day when the Law Lords bade farewell to the House of Lords and sit as Justices of the Supreme Court of the United kingdom at the new Supreme Court in October, they gave judgment on one of the emotive issues of our times in R (on the application of Purdy) v Director of [...] [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 3:12 am
The Supreme Court heard the appeal in R (Agyarko) v Secretary of State for the Home Department on 6-7 April 2016. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:08 am
The Supreme Court will hear the appeal in R (Johnson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department on 25 and 26 July 2016, where it will be asked to consider a challenge to a deportation order, on the grounds that the appellant ought to have been entitled to automatic British citizenship at birth, and as such should not be deported to Jamaica. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 9:58 am
R (Faisaltex Ltd and others) v Crown Court at Preston and another [2008] EWHC 2832 (Admin); [2008] WLR (D) 362 “A computer, or its hard disk, fell within the meaning of ‘material’ in s 8(1) of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 and was to be regarded as a single item or thing, rather than a container of a number of things, so that, where there were reasonable grounds for believing that it contained material evidence, a warrant under s 8 could… [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 9:36 am
R (Haase) v District Judge Nuttall and another [2008] EWCA Civ 1089; [2008] WLR (D) 316 “There was no general requirement that a prosecutor be independent and impartial to comply with the right to a fair trial in art 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 8:36 am
R (M) v Slough Borough Council [2008] UKHL 52; [2008] WLR (D) 292 “A person's need for a refrigerator in which to keep medication did not amount to "need of care and attention" within s 21(1)(a) of the National Assistance Act 1948 (as amended) so as to entitle him to residential accommodation. [read post]
29 May 2007, 2:25 am
R (Baia and another v. [read post]
