Search for: "RESOURCE INVESTMENTS, INC. v. US " Results 241 - 260 of 704
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2018, 10:00 am by Elizabeth Marshall Anderson
Rather, companies and individuals need to take affirmative action to allow the staff to reach a resolution, either in a shorter period of time or by using fewer resources. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
When piracy sites steal content and offer unlicensed streaming services, their costs of production will always be significantly less than for legal services that make investments in creating and distributing content – and in compensating the people employed in and that make investments in creating and distributing the content. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Using number of public traded companies as of the end of 2016 for purposes of calculating an estimated litigation rate (in the absence of 2017 year-end figures), the 2017 litigation rate appears to be about 9% if all securities suit filings are taken into account, or about 4.8% if only the traditional securities suit filings are considered. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The key case on originality in Canada is CCH Canadian Ltd. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The company, Munched, Inc. halted its ICO after being contacted by the SEC, and agreed to an order in which the Commission found that its conduct constituted unregistered securities offers and sales. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 1:07 am by Lorene Park
“Microsoft has invested significant resources in Dreamers, who serve in critical roles at the company,” according to the complaint. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
105 S.Ct. 2218 85 L.Ed.2d 588 HARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS, INC. and the Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., Petitionersv.NATION ENTERPRISES and the Nation Associates, Inc. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
It would repeal section 512(m) and effectively impose a 24-7-365 monitoring obligation on all OSPs, no matter their size or available resources. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm by Daphne Keller
It would repeal section 512(m) and effectively impose a 24-7-365 monitoring obligation on all OSPs, no matter their size or available resources. [read post]