Search for: "RHODES v. STATE"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2008, 7:40 pm
See eBay Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 1:01 am
West v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 2:37 pm
Texas v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 3:17 pm
After a federal court in Missouri halted the CMS Rule in 10 states (see Missouri v. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 11:43 pm
But there's another way, and it's the way the feds chose to go after Pleau.There's this thing called the Interstate Agreement on Detainers which basically says that when State A (say Rhode Island) is holding someone State B (say the federal government*) wants to prosecute, State A has to turn him over to State B.Unless the Governor of State A doesn't want to. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 10:58 am
Rhode Island, 643 F.3d 16 (1st Cir. 2011). [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:21 am
”) United States v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm
States like New York and Rhode Island, which had never taken a position, also adopted laws to allow same-sex marriage. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 12:23 pm
In KWV, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 9:00 am
Emhart Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 7:01 am
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit decision involving a 1977 municipal election in Rhode Island; Roe v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 9:05 pm
Eric Claeys (George Mason/Scalia) on Penn Central v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 6:32 am
A case from the First Department last week - Rhodes-Evans v 111 Chelsea LLC., 2007 NY Slip Op 07540 suggests that for many instances it does not. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 3:00 am
See [United States v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 7:13 am
Justice Goldberg, joined by Chief Justice Suttell, filed a separate dissenting opinion (Town of Cumberland v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 9:40 am
McBride v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:08 pm
[A surreal colloquy from U.S. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 7:18 pm
Goliath v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 11:44 am
The relatively recent expansion of sports betting in the U.S. is a result of the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
